Atlantic cod

Icelandic cod is abundant and not subject to overfishing.Cod fishing in Iceland dates back to at least the 1800s. Catches peaked at over 500,000 tonnes in the 1950s, gradually declining to around 150,000t in the 2000s. They have since increased to around 260,000t.Stock assessments are carried out annually by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The most recent assessment was published in 2023 using data up to 2023. The stock assessment defines reference points for harvest rate (HR) and biomass (B). For the harvest rate, there is a target to keep HR at or below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). For biomass, there is no target. However, there is a trigger point (MSY BTrigger). Below this level, HR should be reduced to allow the stock to increase. Because BMSY is not defined, the Good Fish Guide applies its own definition of 1.4 x MSY BTrigger.The spawning-stock biomass (SSB) was at low levels throughout the 1970s to early 2000s, close to the lowest safe biological limit (125,000 tonnes). It increased to over 500,000 tonnes in 2017 and has since declined to 368,345t in 2023. However, it remains 39% above MSY BTrigger (265,000t). The stock is therefore not in an overfished state.The Harvest Rate (HR) was was high between the 1950s and 2000s, exceeding levels associated with Maximum Sustainable Yield (HR MSY, 0.22). It has rarely been below this level: only in 2013-2016 and again in 2023, when it is 0.20. This is 91% of HR MSY and indicates that the stock is not currently subject to overfishing.Based on Iceland's management plan, catches in the fishing year 2023/2024 should be no more than 211,309 tonnes. This is very similar to the advice from the previous year.

There is a management plan in place, which has successfully reduced fishing pressure. Catch limits are set in line with scientific advice and are expected to keep the stock at target levels. All Icelandic cod landed by the Icelandic fleet is MSC certified. However, management is not adequately controlling the impacts of the fishery on bycatch species. This fishery is MSC certified with conditions relating to bycatch and environmental impacts. There are no requirements or recommendations to make any improvements to management.The Icelandic Ministry of Industries and Innovation (MII) is responsible for management of the Icelandic fisheries and implementation of legislation. Improved management measures by Iceland for most of its major stocks, including cod, haddock, saithe, redfish and herring have resulted in decreased fishing mortality, increased stocks and reduced pressure on benthic habitats.A Harvest Control Rule (HCR) is in place for cod and is reviewed every five years. ICES considers it to be precautionary. It sets catch limits (Total Allowable Catches, TACs) with the aim of maintaining cod at Maximum Sustainable Yield. TACs have been set in line with scientific advice since 2010/11. Landings have exceeded TACs in all but 2 years since 1988, usually by less than 10%. Landings from 2018-2022 averaged 264,010 tonnes, exceeding the average TAC (254,677t) by around 4%.The main reasons given for this by the Icelandic government are: transfer of quota between fishing years or species, allowance for undersized fish, catches of foreign vessels fishing inside the EEZ (Faroes and Norway), and catches for research. TACs only apply to Icelandic fleets, which are responsible for 99% of the total catch. Iceland's scientific advisory body continues to recommend that when setting TACs, managers should take account of all fishing for individual stocks.According to the most recent stock assessment in 2023, estimated fishing pressure is now below MSY and the stock is no longer subject to overfishing.In addition to TACs, the following measures are in place:Fishing is prohibited, for at least two weeks, in areas where more than 25% of the catch (by number) is small cod (less than 55 cm). However, scientists advise that closing small areas for a short time probably doesn't contribute much to the protection of juveniles.Cod spawning areas are closed for 2-3 weeks during the spawning season.Since 1998 the minimum codend mesh size allowed in the trawling fishery has been 135 mm, which could reduce the catch of undersize cod and other unwanted small fish. This is larger than most UK and European fisheries, which is often 120mm.The effects of these measures have not been evaluated.Discarding unwanted fish at sea is banned by the Icelandic government. However, ICES estimates that around 1% of cod landings (by weight) are discarded, and there could be indications that this is increasing.There are a series of measures for monitoring and enforcement, including: publication of individual vessel quotas, independent verification and recording of landings, gear restrictions (and inspections), electronic catch logs, and the coast guard has powers to intercept and inspect vessels. Satellite monitoring of vessel location (through AIS and VMS) is mandatory for all vessels, regardless of size.

Some Icelandic cod is caught by longlining. This method can have a bycatch of vulnerable species. In this fishery, bycatch of spotted wolffish is of concern. There are a number of measures in place to reduce bycatch, but more needs to be done to ensure they are fully effective.100% of Icelandic cod landed by the Icelandic fleet is MSC certified. Around 50% of cod catches are from bottom trawling, 30% from longlining and the remainder from gillnetting, demersal seine and hooks or jigs. The MSC certification is conditional on having a strategy to avoid bycatch, and better data to prove that it is not having a detrimental impact on Endangered, Threatened or Protected species.The main concern is the bycatch of seabirds. Records of interactions with the longline fishery include great black-backed gull and northern fulmar. Both are listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List. However, the Icelandic great black-backed gull population is 50% of the size in the 1970s. Longline bycatch of around 52 individuals per year could account for around 20% of the decline, but population dynamics are variable and it is unclear what the causes are. Northern fulmar is declining rapidly. Causes could include sandeel declines, as this is important prey. Longline bycatch of around 1,000 per year could account for 3% of the decline.Some mitigation measures are in place, but it is unclear if best practice is being followed. The Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP) recommends line weighting to sink baited hooks and reduce their availability to seabirds, bird scaring lines, and setting longlines at night.Vulnerable fish species include the spotted wolffish, which has been steadily declining and is now at its lowest historical level following recruitment failure. It is mainly caught as bycatch and has a recommended catch limit of around 300t. It survives well after being released, and so over-quota wolffish are recommended to be released. However, the certification report suggests a bycatch in the certified cod longline and trawl fleets of over 600 tonnes each in 2020/21, which appears to account for almost all catches of this species and totals 4 times the recommended limit. It seems likely that this fishery is contributing to the unsustainable fishing pressure on this species and could be preventing recovery.Sharks and skates are taken as bycatch in Icelandic fisheries, but the status of many stocks is unknown. There are records of Greenland shark and spurdog bycatch; spurdog is protected under Icelandic law.There was no reported marine mammal bycatch in this fishery between 2014 and 2017.Longlining uses baited hooks to attract fish. The species used for bait in this fishery are herring, Pacific saury and various squid species. The sources of squid do not appear to be well known. It is important to monitor bait use to ensure it does not have an impact on bait species.Longline fisheries have much lower impact on habitats than bottom-towed gear such as trawls. However, if they are bottom longlines using anchoring systems, or are dragged across the seabed during fishing and hauling, they can snag on or otherwise affect vulnerable species such as corals and sponges, which can be slow to recover. Fishing grounds for Icelandic cod vary, depending on the gear type used, but are generally between 100m-500m deep, so there is a low risk of impacts on vulnerable deep-sea habitats (below 600m). Longlining is most common in coastal areas, with an average depth of 160m. There are designated MPAs in Icelandic waters, some of which are closed to all fishing to protect fish spawning areas or habitats. In addition, vessels must move 2nm away from a location if a certain amount of live sponges or corals have been caught. Vessel locations are monitored through AIS and VMS, regardless of vessel size.Cod is on of the most important predator species in Icelandic waters. The impact of removals of this species by fishing is unclear.

ACAP, 2021. ACAP Review of Mitigation Measures and Best Practice Advice for Reducing the Impact of Demersal Longline Fisheries on Seabirds. Reviewed at the Twelfth Meeting of the Advisory Committee. 31 August - 2 September 2021, Online. Available at https://www.acap.aq/resources/bycatch-mitigation/mitigation-advice/3950-acap-2021-demersal-longlines-mitigation-review-bpa/file [Accessed on 10.07.2023].Clark, M., Althaus, F., Schlacher, T., Williams, A., Bowden, D., Rowden, A., 2016. The impacts of deep-sea fisheries on benthic communities: a review. ICES Journal of Marine Science 73: suppl_1. P. i51–i69. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv123.Government of Iceland, 2018. Management Strategy and Harvest Control Rules Available at https://www.government.is/news/article/2018/05/15/Haddock/ [Accessed on 14.07.2022].Government of Iceland, 2022. Ministry of Food٫ Agriculture and Fisheries: Fisheries Management. Available at https://www.government.is/topics/business-and-industry/fisheries-in-iceland/fisheries-management/ [Accessed on 14.07.2022].Hønneland, G., Polonio, V., Scarcella, G. and Tsitsika, E., 2022. Marine Stewardship Council Public Certification Report (Reassessment): ISF Iceland cod. Carried out by Global Trust Certification Ltd. on behalf of Icelandic Sustainable Fisheries (ISF). 21 December 2022. Available at https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/isf-iceland-cod/@@assessments [Accessed on 25.07.2023].ICES, 2022. Icelandic Waters ecoregion – Ecosystem overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2022. ICES Advice 2022, Section 11.1, https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.21731663.ICES, 2022. Icelandic Waters ecosystem – Fisheries overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2022. ICES Advice 2022, section 11.2. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.21487635.ICES. 2022. Northwestern Working Group (NWWG). ICES Scientific Reports. 4:42. 734 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.19771381 [Accessed on 14.07.2022].ICES, 2023. Cod (Gadus morhua) in Division 5.a (Iceland grounds). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2023. ICES Advice 2023, cod.27.5a. Available at https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.21828315.MFRI, 2023. Assessment Reports 2023: Cod, Gadus morhua. Marine and Freshwater Research Institute. Published 9 June 2023. Available at https://www.hafogvatn.is/static/extras/images/01-cod_tr1387969.pdf [Accessed on 25.07.2023].MFRI, 2023. Assessment Reports 2023: Spotted wolffish, Anarhichas minor. Marine and Freshwater Research Institute. Published 9 June 2023. Available at https://www.hafogvatn.is/static/extras/images/16-spottedwolffish_tr1388171.pdf [Accessed on 25.07.2023].MFRI, 2023. State of Marine Stocks and Advice 2023: Cod, Gadus morhua. Marine and Freshwater Research Institute. Published 9 June 2023. Available at https://www.hafogvatn.is/static/extras/images/01-cod1390313.pdf [Accessed on 25.07.2023].Pham, C., Diogo, H., Menezes, G., Porteiro, F., Braga-Henriques, A., Vandeperre F. and Morato, T., 2014. Deep-water longline fishing has reduced impact on Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems. Sci Rep 4, 4837. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04837.Reeves, S. A., Bell, J. B., Cambie, G., Davie, S. L., Dolder, P., Hyder, K., Pontalier, H., Radford Z. and Vaughan, D., 2018. An international review of fisheries management regimes. Cefas. Issued 2 August 2018. Available at http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=14357_A_Review_of_International_Fisheries_Management_Regimes.pdf [Accessed on 06.07.2021].