Atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
What to check for
Location
North Sea, English Channel (East), Skagerrak
Technical location
Atlantic, Northeast, English Channel (East), North Sea, Skagerrak
Caught by
Net (gill or fixed)
Rating summary
North Sea cod is below safe biological levels and there is no recovery plan in place to help the population grow back. Therefore, it receives a critical fail for stock status and is a default red rating. Atlantic cod is listed by OSPAR as a threatened and/or declining species.Rating last updated: July 2022
How we worked out this Rating
North Sea cod is below safe biological levels and and there is no precautionary recovery plan in place. Therefore, it receives a critical fail for stock status and is a default red rating. Atlantic cod is listed by OSPAR as a threatened and/or declining species.The North Sea cod stock has been declining since the early 1970s, when the spawning stock biomass (SSB) was over 200,000 tonnes. It reached an all-time low of 32,000 tonnes in the mid-2000s, before making a small recovery to 85,000 tonnes in 2016. It has declined again since then, and in 2022 is 52,241 tonnes. This is below safe biological limits (BLim, 69,841t) and some way from target levels (MSY BTrigger, 97,777t). The stock has not been at target levels since 1998. The stock is therefore in a very overfished state, and suffering reduced reproductive capacity.Fishing mortality (F) has been above levels associated with Maximum Sustainable Yield (FMSY, 0.28) since the 1960s. For most of that time it has been above the upper limit (Flim, 0.58), putting the stock under very high pressure. However, F has fallen sharply in 2018 and in 2021 it was 0.26 - below FMSY. North Sea cod is therefore not subject to overfishing.ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2023 should be no more than 22,946t. This is a 61% increase on last year's advice, and a 44% increase on last year's catch limit. This is because the stock size has increased.At that catch level, there is still a 17% probability that the stock will be below Blim in 2024 - an improvement on previous years, but higher than the target probability of 5%. Therefore, setting catches at these recommended levels is not a precautionary approach. A zero catch results in a 1.6% probability that the stock will be below Blim.Recruitment of young fish into the stock has been poor since 1998. This is likely owing to a combination of long-term overfishing, which reduced the stock to low levels, and rising sea temperatures. North Sea surface temperatures have increased by 1.68 degrees since 1960. Further increases are expected, and predictions indicate that the North Sea stock is unlikely to recover substantially as a result.There are sub-stocks in different areas of the North Sea: Viking in the north east, and Dogger, which covers the rest of the area. The southern North Sea population appears to have collapsed, as recent surveys show no rebuilding.Between 1975 and 2005, the size at which cod matures reduced from around 75cm to 45cm. This is likely to be, in part, fisheries-induced evolution, especially for male cod. Rising temperatures are also a factor, especially for female cod.
References
EU, 2011. Regulation (EU) No 783/2011 of 5 August 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 724/2010 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of real-time closures of certain fisheries in the North Sea and Skagerrak. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32011R0783.EU, 2022. Council Regulation (EU) 2022/109 of 27 January 2022 fixing for 2022 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in Union waters and for Union fishing vessels in certain non-Union waters. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02022R0109-20220131 [Accessed on 18.07.2022].FMAC, 2021. Fisheries Management and Conservation Group: Minutes: 17th November 2021. Available at https://fisheryprogress.org/sites/default/files/documents_actions/FMAC%20-%202021-17-12%20-%20minutes.pdf [Accessed on 19.07.2022].ICES. 2021. Greater North Sea Sea Ecoregion – Ecosystem overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2021. ICES Advice 2021, Section 9.1, https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.9434 [Accessed on 19.07.2022].ICES. 2021. Greater North Sea ecoregion – Fisheries overview In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2021. ICES Advice 2021, section 9.2. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.9099 [Accessed on 19.07.2022].ICES, 2021. Stock Annex: Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak). Available at https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Stock%20Annexes/2021/cod.27.47d20_SA.pdf [Accessed on 13.07.2021].ICES. 2021. Workshop on estimation of MOrtality of Marine MAmmals due to Bycatch (WKMOMA).ICES Scientific Reports. 3:106. 95 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.9257 [Accessed on 19.07.2022].ICES. 2022. Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, Division 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2022. ICES Advice 2022, cod.27.47d20. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.19447880 [Accessed on 13.07.2022].ICES.2022. Working Group on the Assessment of Demersal Stocks in the North Sea and Skagerrak(WGNSSK).ICES Scientific Reports. 4:43. 1321pp. Available at http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.19786285 [Accessed on 18.07.2022].JNCC, 2021. Seabird Monitoring Programme Report 1986–2019: Guillemot (Uria aalge). Available at https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/guillemot-uria-aalge [Accessed on 19.07.2022].Koul, V., Sguotti, C., Årthun, M., Brune, S., Dusterhus, A., Bogstad, B, Ottersen, G., Baehr, J. and Schrum, C., 2021. Skilful prediction of cod stocks in the North and Barents Sea a decade in advance. Commun Earth Environ 2, 140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00207-6.Marty, L., Rochet, M.J., and Ernande, B., 2014. Temporal trends in age and size at maturation of four North Sea gadoid species: cod, haddock, whiting and Norway pout. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 496: pp 179-197. doi: 10.3354/meps10580.Miles, J., Parsons, M. and O’Brien, S. 2020. Preliminary assessment of seabird population response to potential bycatch mitigation in the UK-registered fishing fleet. Report prepared for the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Project Code ME6024). Available at http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=20461 [Accessed on 13.07.2022].MMO, 2020. UK National North Sea Cod Avoidance Plan. Issued December 2020. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-national-north-sea-cod-avoidance-plan [Accessed on 19.07.2022].NAMMCO, 2022. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission: Harbour porpoise. Available at https://nammco.no/harbour-porpoise/#1475844082849-433d5060-e5a9 [Accessed on 15.07.2022].Northridge, S., Kingston, A., and Coram, A., 2020. Preliminary estimates of seabird bycatch by UK vessels in UK and adjacent waters. Report prepared for the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Project Code ME6024). Available at http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=20461 [Accessed on 13.07.2022].OSPAR, 2021. List of Threatened and/or Declining Species and Habitats: Cod. Available at https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/bdc/species-habitats/list-of-threatened-declining-species-habitats/fish/cod [Accessed on 13.07.2021].RSPB, 2022. Red-throated diver. Available at https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/wildlife-guides/bird-a-z/red-throated-diver/ [Accessed on 19.07.2022].Scottish Government, 2021. European Union, Norway and the United Kingdom - fisheries consultations: agreed records 2022. Available at https://www.gov.scot/publications/european-union-norway-and-the-united-kingdom-fisheries-consultations-agreed-records-2022/pages/cod/ [Accessed on 18.07.2022].Sguotti, C., Otto, S.A., Frelat, R., Langbehn, T.J., Plambech Ryberg, M., Lindegren, M., Durant, J.M., Stenseth, N.C. and Möllmann, C., 2019. Catastrophic dynamics limit Atlantic cod recovery. Proc. R. Soc. B.: 286. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2877.
Sustainable swaps
Learn more about how we calculate our sustainability ratings.
How our ratings work