Herring
Clupea harengus
What to check for
Location
Baltic Sea (Central) (Subdivisions 25-29 and 32) excluding Gulf of Riga
Technical location
Atlantic, Northeast, Baltic Sea
Caught by
Net (gill or fixed)
Rating summary
Updated: June 2020.
The stock is in an overfished state and subject to overfishing. The spawning stock biomass has decreased due to a combination of factors including, rising fishing pressure. The stock is covered by the Baltic Sea Multiannual Plan, and there are agreed quotas between the EU and Russia. There is a slight mismatch between stock area and quota area, but in general, Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and landings have been in line with advice. Discarding is negligible.
This is a well targeted fishery and Baltic Sea herring are predominantly taken alongside sprat in pelagic trawls, which have few, if any, habitat impacts as they do not make contact with the seabed. Purse seiners, gillnetters and trapnet fisheries also participate in the herring fishery but represent marginal volumes in comparison. Sprat and herring are important prey species for cod, and therefore reducing sprat and herring fishing pressure in the areas where Baltic cod are most common could reduce pressure on the cod stock. Central Baltic static net herring fisheries are contributing to population declines of the Baltic harbour porpoise population.
How we worked out this Rating
Herring in the Central Baltic Sea are subject to overfishing but are not currently being overfished. Stock assessments are carried out annually by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The most recent assessment was published in 2024 using data up to that year. The next assessment is expected in 2025.The stock assessment defines reference points for fishing pressure (F) and biomass (B). For fishing pressure, there is a target to keep F at or below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). For biomass, there is no target. However, there is a trigger point (MSY BTrigger). Below this level, F should be reduced to allow the stock to increase. Because BMSY is not defined, the Good Fish Guide applies its own definition of 1.4 x MSY BTrigger.The stock was benchmarked in 2023, resulting in updated reference points for biomass and fishing mortality. Consequently, only assessment results from the last two years should be compared.SSB has been below MSY Btrigger since 1985, was below Blim between 2020 and 2023, but in 2024 is estimated to be above Blim. In 2024, the SSB (SSB2024:MSYBtrigger = 0.60) remained below MSY Btrigger, falling between Bpa (the precautionary point for SSB) and Blim (the limit reference point for SSB). This indicates that the stock is subject to overfishing.Fishing pressure increased in the beginning of 1960s and peaked in 2018. Fishing mortality (F) dropped below the Maximum Sustainable Yield (FMSY) level in 2022 and remained below FMSY in 2023 (F2023:FMSY = 0.85). Therefore, the stock is not currently subject to overfishing.ICES advises that when the EU multiannual plan (MAP) for the Baltic Sea is applied, catch levels in 2025 corresponding to the F ranges in the plan, should be between 95,340 and 125,344 tonnes. This is considered precautionary under the ICES advice rule. The advice applies to all catches from this stock in all areas where it occurs, including Subdivision 28.1 (Gulf of Riga). This represents a 129%–139% increase in catch advice compared to the previous year.This stock comprises several spawning components with varied landings and stock levels. The increased catch advice for 2025 reflects the stock's rising biomass and upward trajectory since 2022. This growth is likely attributable to reduced fishing mortality in recent years, combined with high recruitment in 2022.
Few appropriate management measures are in place, enforced but are only partially effective. The primary concern in this fishery is that Total Allowable Catches (TACs) have consistently been set above scientific recommendations in recent years.This stock is shared between the EU and Russia and is covered under the EU Baltic Sea Multiannual Management Plan (MAP), which provides precautionary advice. However, Russia does not have a management plan for this stock and has not adopted the MAP. Despite joint TAC agreements between the EU and Russia, the shared TAC does not account for herring caught outside the Central Baltic Sea, this could potentially contribute to overfishing. Additionally, Russia did not officially report catch data for 2022 and 2023 to ICES, so the assessment relied on approximate figures.The TAC is based on the advised catch for the Central Baltic stock, plus assumed catch of herring from the Gulf of Riga stock caught in the Central Baltic (based on a 5-year average), minus assumed catch of Central Baltic herring caught in the Gulf of Riga (based on a 5-year average). In 2024, a TAC constraint of 69,425 tonnes was used, since the total TAC in 2023 was slightly above advice. However, the 2024 TAC (67,368 tonnes) was still set above advice (no more than 52,549 tonnes). In 2023, catches exceeded both scientific advice (98,696 tonnes) and the agreed TAC (95,643 tonnes), resulting in a pattern of management not aligning with scientific advice. TACs in 2021 and 2022 also exceeded advised levels by 13% and 12%, respectively, with reported catches closely aligning with or slightly exceeding TACs (1.01 average from 2019–2023, range 0.95–1.04). The stock is vulnerable due to low biomass levels, making continued TAC setting above scientific advice a serious concern. Although the 2025 catch advice increased by ~134% from 2024, driven by an upward revision of the 2022-year class, this does not alleviate long-term risks.Discarding in this fishery is considered negligible. Beyond TACs, the fishery is managed by a Minimum Landing Size (MLS) of 20 cm (18 cm in Skagerrak/Kattegat). Herring in the region typically mature at 18–20 cm, aligning with the MLS.The EU has fishery management measures, which can include catch limits, population targets, and gear restrictions. However, compliance in the EU has been inconsistent, with ongoing challenges in implementing some regulations. The goal of reaching Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) by 2020 was missed. In 2024, the EU reaffirmed their commitment to sustainable fisheries by aligning management with scientific advice to gradually approach MSY. However, no new target date has been set for achieving MSY across all fisheries. The Landing Obligation (LO) requires all quota fish to be landed, even if unwanted (over-quota or below minimum size). It aims to encourage more selective fishing methods, reduce bycatch, and improve catch reporting. However, compliance is poor, and accurate discard levels are hard to quantify with current monitoring programmes. The Marine Conservation Society views Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with cameras is one of the most cost-effective tools for providing reliable fisheries data and aiding informed management decisions. Fully monitored fisheries enhance collaboration, data accuracy, stock recovery, and reduce impacts on marine wildlife and habitats. However, the full potential of REM may only be achieved when it tracks fishing location and documents catch and bycatch, particularly where vulnerable species and habitats are at risk. As of January 2024, the EU is introducing a Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) mandate for EU vessels, including CCTV cameras on vessels 18m or more that pose a potential risk of non-compliance, within the next 4 years.
Herring are caught by static nets (gill or fixed net) in the coastal waters of the Central Baltic Sea.
Baltic herring is caught in coastal waters by trapnets and gillnets for human consumption. The trapnet and gillnet fisheries for herring are minor in comparison to the pelagic trawling fishery within the area. Incidental catch of non-target species (bycatch) is thought to be low, but, where incidental catch does occur species may include cod or sprat.
As the fisheries in this area also take sprat, species misreporting of herring has occurred in the past, and there are indications of sprat being misreported as herring. Recent legislation has forced catches to be sorted before landing, but the approach to this has been variable and might need further exploration. The bycatch level of other species such as juvenile cod is unknown. Currently, the eastern cod stock is concentrated in sub-divisions 25-26 and shows poor growth conditions, most likely due to the lack of food. This may be related to low abundance of herring in this area which is a prey species. Closures of the herring and sprat fisheries in areas where cod are more abundant could help mitigate this issue.
Gillnets and static nets in the Central Baltic sea have little impact upon the coastal seabed. However, static nets in the Baltic are known to impact harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) populations (exceeding internationally adopted thresholds of acceptability in the Baltic Sea), grey seals and a variety of diving water-birds (including long-tailed ducks, scoters and divers amongst other species) especially in wintering areas. Diving water birds are especially vulnerable to being entangled in gillnets and other types of static nets.
The Baltic Proper harbour porpoise is listed as Critically Endangered (CR) by IUCN and HELCOM. All EU Member State assessments and the EU biogeographical assessment of the conservation status of the harbour porpoise in the Baltic Marine Region have been assessed as unfavourable-bad for the last three consecutive assessments under Article 17, reporting for the Habitats Directive (since 2001). ASCOBANS considers that the Baltic subpopulation of the harbour porpoise is of particular concern . HELCOM is deeply concerned about the population status of harbour porpoise in the Baltic Sea and convinced that the critical status of harbour porpoises in the Baltic Sea calls for immediate actions in order to safeguard their survival .
Following an EU request on emergency measures to prevent bycatch Baltic Proper harbour porpoise in the Northeast Atlantic, in May 2020, ICES concluded that the proposed measures by NGOs for the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise are appropriate to reduce the bycatch. However, several spatio-temporal and technical amendments are recommended. In the latest threat matrix developed by ICES WGMME (2019), threat levels for the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise were considered high for bycatch. Static gears (trammel nets, gillnets, and semi-driftnets) pose a considerably higher bycatch risk for porpoise than all other gear types. To immediately reduce bycatch of harbour porpoise, a set of five measures have been recommended by ICES, including the closure of important habitats, closures of areas during breeding season, and areas known to have high densities of animals, the mandatory use of pingers on static nets where animals are regularly present and during seasonal distribution. For marine mammals to attain a favourable or good conservation status, relevant EU legislation requires that bycatch of marine mammals should not exceed predetermined levels. For the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise management unit, to meet the management objective of achieving bycatches below PBR (<0.7 individuals per year), all fisheries of concern should be closed. Application of ICES advice and the proposed measures are yet to be displayed.
References
EC (1983). COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2931/83 of 4 October 1983 amending Regulation (EEC) No 171 /83 laying down certain technical measures for the conservation of fishery resources. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31983R2931&from=EL [Accessed 18.06.2020]
EU (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 establishing a multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R1139 [Accessed 29.06.2020]
Grohsler, T. (2019). Stock Annex: Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25- “29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea). Available at https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Stock%20Annexes/2019/her.27.25-2932_SA.pdf [Accessed 24.06.2020]
ICES (2019). Baltic Sea Ecoregion - “ Ecosystem overview. Available at http://ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2019/2019/EcosystemOverview_BalticSea_2019.pdf [Accessed 24.06.2020]
ICES (2019). Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME). ICES Scientific Reports, 1:22. 133 pp. Available at http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.4980 [Accessed 30.07.2020]
ICES (2020). Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS). ICES Scientific Reports, 2 (45), p.43. Doi: http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.6024. Available at http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Expert%20Group%20Report/Fisheries%20Resources%20Steering%20Group/2020/ICES%20WGBFAS%202020%20Report.pdf [Accessed 29.06.2020]
ICES (2020). EU request on emergency measures to prevent bycatch of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) and Baltic Proper harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Northeast Atlantic. Available at http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2020/2020/eu.2020.04.pdf [Accessed 24.06.2020]
ICES (2020). Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions 25- “29 and 32, excluding the Gulf of Riga (central Baltic Sea). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2020. ICES Advice 2020, her.27.25-2932. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.5828. Available at http://ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2020/2020/her.27.25-2932.pdf [Accessed 24.06.2020]
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (2019). European sprat Baltic Sea. FishSource profit. In FishSource [online]. Updated 13 July 2019. Available at https://www.fishsource.org/stock_page/1833 [Accessed 29.06.2020]
Sustainable swaps
Learn more about how we calculate our sustainability ratings.
How our ratings work