Management measures have not been following scientific advice. There is no precautionary recovery plan with targets or timelines to recover the stock.Commercial catches of pollack in the English Channel and Celtic Seas are mainly made by the UK, France, and Ireland. The EU has a Multiannual Plan (MAP) for its fleets, but the UK is not part of it. Instead, catch limits are agreed separately during negotiations between the UK and EU.Most catches (98%) are in area 7, which covers the Irish Sea, southwest UK and Ireland, and English Channel. A little is caught in area 6, which is the west of Scotland.Catch limits, known as Total Allowable Catches (TACs), are the main management measure. From 2019-2023, the advised maximum commercial catch was 3,360 tonnes. TACs averaged 9,850t, which is 293% of the advice. In 2024 and 2025 there was zero catch advice. However, TACs and the catch in 2024 (2,144t) were above this. Management is therefore not following the scientific advice and has not been controlling the fishery.A substantial amount is also caught by recreational fishing, but there are no figures for how much. It could be equal to or higher than commercial landings. As a result, total removals by fishing could have been above the recommended limits. There are no management measures for this sector.Stock assessments prior to 2023 were data limited, and it was unclear whether the declining trend in landings indicated a declining population. However, the management approach has not been precautionary, and monitoring of total removals has been inadequate. As a result, this stock is now heavily depleted and ICES recommended zero catch in 2024 and 2025.Discards are negligible (less than 1% of the commercial catch), likely because there are effectively no limits on how much can be landed. Pollack are mainly targeted during the first quarter of the year, which coincides with spawning. There is a minimum landing size of 30cm. Female pollack are thought to mature at 35cm or more, so this does not protect juveniles. The EU and UK both have fishery management measures, which can include catch limits, population targets, and gear restrictions. However, compliance in the EU and UK has been inconsistent, with ongoing challenges in implementing some regulations. The goal of reaching Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) by 2020 was missed, with less than half of UK TACs in 2024 following ICES advice. In 2024, the EU and UK reaffirmed their commitment to sustainable fisheries by aligning management with scientific advice to gradually approach MSY. However, no new target date has been set for achieving MSY across all fisheries. The Landing Obligation (LO), an EU law retained by the UK post-Brexit, requires all quota fish to be landed, even if unwanted (over-quota or below minimum size). It aims to encourage more selective fishing methods, reduce bycatch, and improve catch reporting. However, compliance is poor, and accurate discard levels are hard to quantify with current monitoring programmes. The UK is in the process of replacing the LO with country-specific Catching Policies. The Marine Conservation Society views Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with cameras is one of the most cost-effective tools for providing reliable fisheries data and aiding informed management decisions. Fully monitored fisheries enhance collaboration, data accuracy, stock recovery, and reduce impacts on marine wildlife and habitats. However, the full potential of REM may only be achieved when it tracks fishing location and documents catch and bycatch, particularly where vulnerable species and habitats are at risk. As of January 2024, the EU is introducing a Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) mandate for EU vessels, including CCTV cameras on vessels 18m or more that pose a potential risk of non-compliance, within the next 4 years. Across the UK, different approaches to REM are being taken and legislation is expected to be in place across all 4 countries within the next few years. The Fisheries Act (2020) requires the development of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) (replacing EU Multi-Annual Plans) in the UK. 43 FMPs have been proposed and are at various stages of development and implementation, these should all be published by the end of 2028. FMPs have the potential to be very important tools for managing UK fisheries, although data limitations may delay them for some stocks. It is also essential the UK governments define and adopt a standardised approach or model across the four nations to a universally defined FMP design, to ensure the consistence, quality and coherence of all the proposal FMPs. The Marine Conservation Society is keen to see publicly available Fishery Management Plans for all commercially exploited stocks, especially where stocks are depleted, that include: An overview of the fishery including current stock status, spatial coverage, current fishing methods and impacts Targets for fishing pressure and biomass, and additional management when those targets are not being met, based on the best scientific evidence Timeframes for stock recovery Improved data collection, transparency, and accountability, supported by technologies such as Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) Consideration of wider environmental impacts of the fishery, including habitat impacts and minimising bycatch Stakeholder engagement For more information about this fishery in Cornwall, see: https://www.cornwallgoodseafoodguide.org.uk/fish-guide/pollack.php
