Sardine

Sardines in the Bay of Biscay are overfished but are not subject to overfishing.Stock assessments are carried out annually by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The most recent assessment was published in 2024 using data up to 2024. The next assessment is expected in 2025.The stock assessment defines reference points for fishing pressure (F) and biomass (B). For fishing pressure, there is a target to keep F at or below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). For biomass, there is no target. However, there is a trigger point (MSY BTrigger). Below this level, F should be reduced to allow the stock to increase.The sardine population (or stock) in this region has experienced a general decline since 2010. The spawning stock biomass (SSB) was estimated at 62,982 tonnes in 2024, below MSY Btrigger (78,700 tonnes) and Bpa proxy (67,500), but above Blim (56,300 tonnes) the limit reference point for biomass. Biomass has been at similar levels since 2021. Therefore, the stock is considered to be overfished.Fishing pressure (F) has been high in recent years. F has been above levels consistent with fishing at maximum sustainable yield (MSY) since 2014. In 2023, F reduced to the lowest level since 2014, at 0.35, which is below FMSY (0.45). Therefore, the stock is not subject to overfishing.ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2025 should be no more than 23,667 tonnes. This is a 19.5% increase in advice from 2024 due to high recruitment in 2023 leaving to a slight increase in biomass levels.

Sardine in this region is poorly managed and requires considerable improvement. In recent years, fishing levels have been too high, and management measures have not protected population levels.There are no specific management objectives or a management plan for this population (or stock) at the moment. There is ongoing discussion about a Management Plan or Total Allowable Catch (TAC) through the SWWAC (South West Waters Advisory Council) for this population, but the plan has not been formalised yet.Between 2014-2019 catches consistently exceeded advice. Between 2020-2022 total annual catch was within advised catch limits. Despite this, fishing pressure in this period (0.47, 0.6 and 0.52 respectively) was above maximum sustainable yield (FMSY 0.45). In 2023, catches (approximately 23,000t) were 8% above advice, however 2024 catches are not expected to exceed advice.Regulation measures for sardine fished within European waters:Minimum landing size (as detailed below)Restrictions on mesh sizes for netsA Minimum Conservation Reference Size (MCRS), i.e., minimum catch size, of 11 cm in place for sardine caught in European waters, which provides limited protection to immature fish. Sardine taken below the length at fist maturity (average 14.8cm, range 10.9-16.8cm) would likely not have had the chance to reproduce.Discarding in this fishery is negligible. The EU and UK both have fishery management measures, which can include catch limits, population targets, and gear restrictions. However, compliance in the EU and UK has been inconsistent, with ongoing challenges in implementing some regulations. The goal of reaching Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) by 2020 was missed, with less than half of UK TACs in 2024 following ICES advice. In 2024, the EU and UK reaffirmed their commitment to sustainable fisheries by aligning management with scientific advice to gradually approach MSY. However, no new target date has been set for achieving MSY across all fisheries. The Landing Obligation (LO), an EU law retained by the UK post-Brexit, requires all quota fish to be landed, even if unwanted (over-quota or below minimum size). It aims to encourage more selective fishing methods, reduce bycatch, and improve catch reporting. However, compliance is poor, and accurate discard levels are hard to quantify with current monitoring programmes. The UK is in the process of replacing the LO with country-specific Catching Policies. The Marine Conservation Society views Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with cameras is one of the most cost-effective tools for providing reliable fisheries data and aiding informed management decisions. Fully monitored fisheries enhance collaboration, data accuracy, stock recovery, and reduce impacts on marine wildlife and habitats. However, the full potential of REM may only be achieved when it tracks fishing location and documents catch and bycatch, particularly where vulnerable species and habitats are at risk. As of January 2024, the EU is introducing a Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) mandate for EU vessels, including CCTV cameras on vessels 18m or more that pose a potential risk of non-compliance, within the next 4 years. Across the UK, different approaches to REM are being taken and legislation is expected to be in place across all 4 countries within the next few years. The Marine Conservation Society is keen to see publicly available Fishery Management Plans for all commercially exploited stocks, especially where stocks are depleted, that include: An overview of the fishery including current stock status, spatial coverage, current fishing methods and impacts Targets for fishing pressure and biomass, and additional management when those targets are not being met, based on the best scientific evidence Timeframes for stock recovery Improved data collection, transparency, and accountability, supported by technologies such as Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) Consideration of wider environmental impacts of the fishery, including habitat impacts and minimising bycatch Stakeholder engagement

Some sardine in this area is caught by pelagic trawls. Although bycatch is low there are concerns about the high mortality of dolphins by some fishing methods in the Bay of Biscay, including pelagic trawls.Sardines are a small schooling fish found in coastal shelf waters, mainly at depths above 150m. They form dense schools (or shoals) in pelagic waters which, in this region, are targeted by French and Spanish fishers. 25% of catches by pelagic trawlers.Pelagic trawls are towed in mid-water with no intentional contact with the seabed, thus negligible impact on the seabed environment. Pelagic trawls are species specific in operation, but on occasion can bycatch marine mammals, other pelagic fish and surface-dwelling birds on hauling.Although negligible bycatch is reported in the fishery overall there are serious concerns for common dolphins in the Bay of Biscay caught in gears including mid-water trawls. These catches occur at a scale that may exceed internationally adopted thresholds of acceptability. Increased surveillance and testing of measures to minimise catches of dolphins and porpoises are underway, however, the measures used in the sardine fishery are not known.The overall impact of the sardine fishery on the pelagic ecosystem in this ecoregion has not been evaluated. Sardine has been found to be important in the diet of many cetacean species, notably common dolphins. This overlap in feeding preferences is thought to increase the risk of dolphins being caught by pelagic trawls while feeding and may be an underlying mechanism to explain the high rate of common dolphin bycatch observed in the pelagic trawl fishery in the Bay of Biscay. As with many other pelagic species, sardine, due to a high dependency on lower trophic levels, can be highly vulnerable to changes in plankton community, environmental conditions, and climate change.UK regulations to reduce the impacts of fishing on marine habitats and wider species are under development, in the meantime most EU regulations have been adopted. Under EU legislation, bycatch species should be managed within scientifically defined or, where data isn’t available, suitability precautionary sustainable exploration limits. If stocks fall below a certain threshold, measures can be brought in such as gear limitations (e.g., mesh size or depth of use), time and/or areas closures, and Minimum Conservation Reference Sizes (MCRS).

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:01998R0850-20150601&qid=1463153613173&from=EN [Accessed on 24.07.2025].Dars, C., Dabin, W., Demaret, F., Doremus, G., Meheust, E., Mendez-Fernandez, P., Peltier, H., Spitz, J. and Van Canneyt, O., 2017. Les echouages de mammiferes marins sur le littoral francais en 2017. Reseau National Echouages (RNE), Rapport annuel. Available at http://www.observatoire-pelagis.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/rapportechouages2017.pdfDars, C., Meheust, E., Genu, M. et al., 2021. Les echouages de mammiferes marins sur le littoral francais en 2021. Reseau National Echouages (RNE), Rapport annuel. Available at https://www.observatoire-pelagis.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/rapport_echouage_2021_20221125.pdfICES, 2018. Bycatch of small cetaceans and other marine animals – review of national reports under Council Regulation (EC) No. 812/2004 and other information. Available at https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2018/2018/byc.eu.pdfICES, 2020. EU request on emergency measures to prevent bycatch of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) and Baltic Proper harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Northeast Atlantic. Available at http://ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Advice/2020/Special_Requests/eu.2020.04.pdfICES, 2022. Stock Annex: Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.a–b and 8.d (Bay of Biscay). ICES Stock Annexes. 37 pp. Available at:https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.18623198 [Accessed on 24.07.2025].ICES, 2023. EU additional request on mitigation measures to reduce by-catches of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) in the Bay of Biscay. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2023. ICES Advice 2023, sr.2023.01. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.21946634 [Accessed on 24.07.2025].ICES, 2024. Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast ecoregion – Ecosystem overview. In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2024. ICES Advice 2024, Section 6.1, Available at: https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.27899889 [Accessed on 24.07.2025].ICES, 2024. Working Group on Southern Horse Mackerel, Anchovy and Sardine (WGHANSA). ICES Scientific Reports. 6:46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.26003356 [Accessed on 24.07.2025].ICES, 2024. Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in divisions 8.a-b and 8.d (Bay of Biscay). In Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2024. ICES Advice 2024, pil.27.8abd, Available at: https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.25027493 [Accessed on 24.07.2025].Peltier, H., Authier, M., Deaville, R., Dabin, W., Jepson, P. D., van Canneyt, O., Daniel, P. and Ridoux, V. (2016). Small cetacean bycatch as estimated from stranding schemes: The common dolphin case in the northeast Atlantic. Environmental Science and Policy, 63: 7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.004. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1462901116301514Seafish, 2025. Gear: Pelagic trawl. Available at https://www.seafish.org/responsible-sourcing/fishing-gear-database/gear/pelagic-trawl/ Accessed on 24.07.2025].Silva, A., Santos, M.B., Caneco, B., Pestana, G., C. Porteiro, C., Carrera, P., Stratoudakis, Y., (2006). Temporal and geographic variability of sardine maturity at length in the northeastern Atlantic and the western Mediterranean, ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 663–676, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.01.005UK Government, 2025. Statutory guidance: Minimum Conservation Reference Sizes (MCRS) in UK waters. Updated 14 February 2025. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/minimum-conservation-reference-sizes-mcrs/minimum-conservation-reference-sizes-mcrs-in-uk-waters [Accessed on 24.07.2025].