Spider crab
Maja squinado
What to check for
Location
UK
Technical location
Atlantic, Northeast, Irish Sea, Porcupine Bank, English Channel, Bristol Channel, Celtic Seas, West and Southwest of Ireland, North Sea, Rockall, West of Scotland
Caught by
Net (gill or fixed)
Rating summary
This stock is data limited and the status of spider crabs around the UK is currently unknown. There is concern for biomass but no concern for fishing pressure. Few appropriate management measures are in place, and their effectiveness cannot be fully assessed due to limited data. UK minimum landing sizes are enforced, but these are below estimates for maturity. Spider crabs are often caught in tangle nets where there is thought to be a high level of bycatch and crabs can be damaged.Rating last updated December 2025.
Technical consultation summary
Route 2 (data-limited) scoring has been applied to this rating due to the lack of biomass and fishing pressure reference points. Spider crabs have low vulnerability to fishing pressure. There is concern for biomass due to a lack of assessments and information. However, there is no concern for current fishing pressure as landings in 2023 (424 tonnes) were below the 2019-2022 average (481 tonnes). Few appropriate management measures are in place, and their effectiveness cannot be fully assessed due to limited data. A UK minimum landing size is enforced, but is below estimates for maturity. Some inshore local management authorities have further regulations on spider crab netting. Spider crabs are often caught in tangle nets where there is thought to be a high level of bycatch and crabs can be damaged.
How we worked out this Rating
This stock is data limited and the status of spider crabs around the UK is currently unknown. There is concern for biomass but no concern for fishing pressure.Route 2 (data limited) scoring has been applied to this rating owing to the lack of data about the species biomass and catch limits. There is no available data on spider crab resilience to fishing pressure, but they are considered to have low (0.12) vulnerability to fishing.No assessment of biomass is undertaken across this spider crab fishing area and stock status reports are not regularly produced for the species. Therefore, there is concern for the biomass.There are no reference points to determine fishing pressure. In 2023, MMO landings from UK vessels operating in the UK EEZs were estimated at just over 424 tonnes. This is an increase from 2022, when landings were around 410 tonnes, but remains below the four-year average (2019-2022) of over 481 tonnes. Although there is no clear trend and the data is limited, there is currently no concern for fishing pressure.Given the lack of biomass data and the likely influence of market value on landings, it is difficult to determine the overall status of spider crabs. To better assess and understand the stock, fisheries-independent data and more accurate evaluations of bycatch levels are needed.
Few appropriate management measures are in place, and their effectiveness cannot be fully assessed due to limited data. A UK minimum landing size is enforced, but is below estimates for maturity.Due to a lack of data about the species biomass, it is not possible to assess whether current fishing levels are sustainable. Considerable improvements are needed including regular stock assessments for spider crab to guide management.There is a Minimum Conservation Reference Size (MCRS) of 130 mm carapace length for males, and 120 mm for females, with spider crabs required to be landed whole. This is below maturity estimates of 136.5 mm for males, and 130.3 mm for females. Also, it is likely that this standard size does not optimise reproduction and landings as some stocks mature smaller and some larger than this size. There are no closed seasons, prohibitions for taking berried or moulting crabs or maximum size limit in place.Additional protection may exist in inshore areas, where local byelaws and regulations apply. For example, Devon & Severn Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authority (IFCA) have a MCRS of 130 mm for both sexes and have permit conditions to net for spider crabs. Similarly, Southern IFCA have regulations surrounding net fishing, including prohibited areas. There may also be overlap with Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which impose further restrictions on fishing effort, gear, and landings to support habitats and commercial species. All vessels registered in the UK must have a domestic fishing vessel license to fish within the UK EEZ for sea fish that will be sold. No new licenses are being issued. All commercial vessels under 10m, with a shellfish license, are required to complete Monthly Shellfish Activity Return (MSAR) forms for the Marine Management Organisation (MMO). These must include the catch and retained weight each day along with the date, name of the vessel, vessel registration number, gear type, area and port of landing. All vessels over 10m do not need to complete MSAR as they will be completing an EU logbook of catches. For all vessels, effort is reported as days fished, and not as pots fished. The Marine Conservation Society views Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) with cameras is one of the most cost-effective tools for providing reliable fisheries data and aiding informed management decisions. Fully monitored fisheries enhance collaboration, data accuracy, stock recovery, and reduce impacts on marine wildlife and habitats. However, the full potential of REM may only be achieved when it tracks fishing location and documents catch and bycatch, particularly where vulnerable species and habitats are at risk. As of January 2024, the EU is introducing a Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) mandate for EU vessels, including CCTV cameras on vessels 18m or more that pose a potential risk of non-compliance, within the next 4 years. Across the UK, different approaches to REM are being taken and legislation is expected to be in place across all 4 countries within the next few years.The Fisheries Act (2020) requires the development of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) (replacing EU Multi-Annual Plans) in the UK. 43 FMPs have been proposed and are at various stages of development and implementation, these should all be published by the end of 2028. FMPs have the potential to be very important tools for managing UK fisheries, although data limitations may delay them for some stocks. It is also essential the UK governments define and adopt a standardised approach or model across the four nations to a universally defined FMP design, to ensure the consistence, quality and coherence of all the proposal FMPs.The Marine Conservation Society is keen to see publicly available Fishery Management Plans for all commercially exploited stocks, especially where stocks are depleted, that include:An overview of the fishery including current stock status, spatial coverage, current fishing methods and impactsTargets for fishing pressure and biomass, and additional management when those targets are not being met, based on the best scientific evidenceTimeframes for stock recoveryImproved data collection, transparency, and accountability, supported by technologies such as Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM)Consideration of wider environmental impacts of the fishery, including habitat impacts and minimising bycatchStakeholder engagementA Crab and Lobster FMP has been proposed, coordinated by Defra, which incorporates this species. At the time of writing, it is too soon to know whether proposed management measures will be effective in managing the stock. For more information about this FMP and expected progress and timelines, see https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/joint-fisheries-statement-jfs/list-of-fisheries-management-plans
Spider crabs are often caught in tangle nets where there is thought to be a high level of bycatch and crabs can be damaged.In 2023, 16.3% of landed spider crabs were caught using fixed or drift nets. These nets are often multipurpose tangle nets, which also target monkfish and flatfish. The loose netting of tangle nets is particularly effective for these species, as their body shapes make them less likely to be meshed by standard gillnets but more prone to being entangled by slack netting.Despite their widespread use, there is limited research on the impacts of tangle netting in particular, and bycatch data remains limited. Tangle nets are considered non-selective and are thought to generate significant bycatch, including sharks, rays, skates, cetaceans, and seals. Spider crabs themselves are difficult to remove from the nets, often resulting in declawing or damage. When undersized crabs are injured and discarded, their chances of survival are reduced. These injuries can be permanent, especially for fully grown crabs which do not moult after reaching full size and therefore cannot regenerate lost limbs.In UK waters, mesh size requirements apply to gill, trammel, and drift nets. These regulations aim to allow juvenile fish to escape capture, but they are less effective for spider crabs due to their body shape.Nylon nets, if lost, can continue to fish for several weeks before becoming tangled and bundled up, a phenomenon known as 'ghost fishing'. However, static nets, as with all gear, represent an investment by fishermen, and therefore there are incentives to avoid losing or damaging gear.To improve monitoring and reporting of fishing activity, MCS would like to see remote electronic monitoring (REM) with cameras implemented, used and enforced.
References
Corgos, A. and Freire, J., 2006. Morphometric and gonad maturity in the spider crab Maja brachydactyla: a comparison of methods for estimating size at maturity in species with determinate growth. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63(5), pp.851-859.D&S IFCA, 2025. Minimum Conservation Reference Sizes. Available at: Minimum Conservation Reference Sizes | Devon & Severn IFCA | Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority [Accessed on 03.12.2025].D&S IFCA, 2025. Netting Permit Byelaw. Available at: Current Permit Byelaws & Permit Conditions | Devon & Severn IFCA | Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority [Accessed on 03.12.2025].Gall, S.C., Rodwell, L.D., Clark, S., Robbins, T., Attrill, M.J., Holmes, L.A. and Sheehan, E.V., 2020. The impact of potting for crustaceans on temperate rocky reef habitats: Implications for management, Marine Environmental Research, Volume 162, 105134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105134.GOV.UK, 2025. Guidance: Record your catch. Available at: Record your catch - GOV.UK [Accessed on 20.11.2025]GOV.UK. 2025. Manage your fishing effort: Western Waters crabs and scallops. Available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/manage-your-fishing-effort-western-waters-crabs [Accessed on 24.11.2025].MMO, 2025. Minimum Conservation Reference Sizes (MCRS) in UK waters. Available at: Minimum Conservation Reference Sizes (MCRS) in UK waters - GOV.UK [Accessed 19.11.2025]MMO, 2025. Technical Conservation and Landing Obligation rules and regulations 2025. Available at: Technical Conservation and Landing Obligation rules and regulations 2025 - GOV.UK [Accessed on 03.12.2025]MMO, 2023. UK sea fisheries annual statistics report 2023. Available at: UK sea fisheries annual statistics report 2023 - GOV.UK [Accessed on 24.11.2025]Öndes, F., Kaiser, M., & Murray, L. 2018. Fish and invertebrate by-catch in the crab pot fishery in the Isle of Man, Irish Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98(8), 2099-2111. doi:10.1017/S0025315417001643Palomares, M.L.D. and D. Pauly. Editors. 2025. SeaLifeBase. Maja squinado, spinous spider crab, World Wide Web electronic publication. www.sealifebase.org, version (04/2025) [Accessed on 03.12.2025].Seafish. Tangle Nets. Available at https://www.seafish.org/responsible-sourcing/fishing-gear-database/gear/tangle-nets/#top [Accessed on 03.12.2025].Southern IFCA, 2025. Net fishing byelaws. Available at: Net Fishing : Southern IFCA [Accessed on 03.12.2025].
Sustainable swaps
Learn more about how we calculate our sustainability ratings.
How our ratings work