Swordfish
Xiphias gladius
What to check for
Location
South Atlantic
Technical location
Atlantic, Eastern Central, Atlantic, Southeast, Atlantic, Southwest, Atlantic, Western Central, All areas, All areas, All areas, All areas
Caught by
Hook & line (longline)
Rating summary
The abundance of swordfish in the south Atlantic Ocean is too low, and fishing pressure is slightly too high. Management has reduced catches to rebuild the stock. However, there are some uncertainties in the catch data, and monitoring and enforcement needs to be improved. Almost all swordfish catches in the south Atlantic are by longline, which bycatches highly vulnerable species such as sharks, turtles, and seabirds.Rating last updated January 2023.
Technical consultation summary
The swordfish stock in the south Atlantic Ocean is overfished and marginally subject to overfishing. A new stock assessment was carried out in 2022, using data up to 2020. Biomass was estimated to be 77% of BMSY and fishing pressure has increased to just above FMSY, at 103%. Management has reduced catches to rebuild the stock. However, for a number of years the scientific committee has raised concerns that countries are not reporting dead discards or live releases of swordfish, which means total fishing mortality is likely to be underestimated. This information is required, but not being provided. The mandatory level of observer coverage in the north and south Atlantic swordfish fisheries is low, at just 10%. Many countries are not achieving this level. This is below the recommended minimum of 20%. Monitoring and enforcement therefore requires improvement. Swordfish in the south Atlantic are mainly caught by longlining. While longlining is unlikely to have habitat impacts, it bycatches highly vulnerable species including sharks, turtles, and seabirds. Bycatch data is based on observer data, which is not comprehensive enough for a complete understanding of fishery impacts. Mitigation measures do not follow recommended best practice.
How we worked out this Rating
The swordfish stock in the south Atlantic Ocean is overfished and marginally subject to overfishing.This stock is managed and assessed by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The last stock assessment was carried out in 2022, using data up to 2020. It is unclear when the next stock assessment will be.Atlantic swordfish has been caught in targeted fisheries since the 1950s. In the south, catches steadily increased to a peak of 20,000 tonnes in the 1990s. They have since declined to around 10,000t. However, since 1991, very few fleets have reported dead discards for Atlantic swordfish stocks and the Scientific Committee has concerns that what has been reported is not necessarily representative of the entire fishery.Biomass (B) of the stock was almost double target levels (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) between 1950 and 1990, and then dropped sharply. It has been below BMSY since the mid-1990s. In 2020, biomass was estimated to be 77% of BMSY. Therefore, the stock is in an overfished state.Fishing mortality (F) was significantly above MSY levels between 1992 and 2010. It then declined and in 2015, F was 98% of FMSY. In 2020, F has increased to just above FMSY, at 103%. Therefore, the stock is now marginally subject to overfishing.The 2017 assessment indicated that catches below 11,000t would keep the population to be above BMSY and below FMSY in 2020 with 60% probability. However, despite catches averaging 10,125t, the 2022 assessment shows that it is below BMSY and above FMSY. This is because the stock is now thought to be less productive. The estimated Maximum Sustainable Yield has decreased from 14,570t in 2015 to 11,481t in 2020.Under current catch levels (2017-2019 average = 9,826t), the South Atlantic swordfish stock has a 55% probability of being above BMSY and below FMSY by 2033.
South Atlantic swordfish is in an overfished state, but management has reduced catches to rebuild the stock. However, there are some uncertainties in the catch data, and monitoring and enforcement needs to be improved.Tuna, marlin, and swordfish are highly migratory species, found on the high seas and in numerous countries' waters. This makes harmonised and effective management challenging. Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) are responsible for monitoring and managing these stocks on behalf of the countries that access them. However, the degree to which management is implemented, monitored and enforced by each country varies significantly.This stock is managed and assessed by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). South Atlantic swordfish is currently in an overfished state, but there is no rebuilding plan. The main management measures are a catch limit (Total Allowable Catch, TAC) and a minimum size limit.The south Atlantic swordfish TAC for 2023-2026 is 10,000t, with individual catch limits assigned to each country. This was a reduction from the previous TAC of 14,000t, in response to scientific advice that catches at that level only had a 3% probability of rebuilding the stock to BMSY by 2033. Management is therefore following scientific advice. However, if the recent average catch of 9,826t is maintained, the stock only has a 55% probability of being above BMSY and below FMSY by 2033. Catches have stayed within the limits. The average from 2018-2021 is around 9,700t. However, for a number of years the scientific committee has raised concerns that countries are not reporting dead discards or live releases of swordfish, which means total fishing mortality is likely to be underestimated. This information is required, but not being provided. The mandatory level of observer coverage in the north and south Atlantic swordfish fisheries is low, at just 5%, rising to 10% in 2022. Many countries are not achieving this level. This is below the recommended minimum of 20%. Monitoring and enforcement therefore requires improvement.There is also a minimum catch size of 25kg or 125cm, with some exceptions. This has not significantly reduced landings of undersize south Atlantic swordfish, which decreased slightly from 19% in 2006 to 13% in 2015. Undersize fish hooked in longlines experience a high mortality (around 80%). The lack of reporting on dead discards or live releases of swordfish mean that there is not enough data on the impact of the size limits. It is recommended that more complete data be gathered on fishing effort and size data over the entire Atlantic.In terms of enforcement and compliance with management measures: in 2016 ICCAT passed measures to strengthen and streamline its compliance assessment process and to develop a scheme of responses to non-compliance. There is also a list of vessels authorised to fish for tuna and tuna-like species in the ICCAT area, and a list of vessels caught carrying out Illegal, Unreported or Unregulated activities. At-sea transhipment is prohibited unless pre-authorised and the vessel has an observer on board. Vessel Monitoring Systems are required for all vessels over 24m, but smaller vessels are less well monitored. Swordfish must be accompanied by Catch Documentation when being imported and exported.
Swordfish in the south Atlantic are mainly caught by longlining. While longlining is unlikely to have habitat impacts, it can have a bycatch of highly vulnerable species such as sharks, turtles, and seabirds.Around 99% of south Atlantic swordfish are caught by surface-drifting longline. Monitoring and reporting of bycatch in fisheries managed by ICCAT is poor. Most data comes from scientific observers on vessels. Scientific recommendations are that 20% of a fishery should be observed for accurate data. ICCAT only requires coverage of 5%, increasing to 10% in 2022. Many fleets are not reaching this level. This makes it difficult to assess the impact of these fisheries on vulnerable species.Longlining for swordfish and albacore tuna takes place closer to the surface than in other fisheries. This increases the bycatch risk, as animals such as seabirds are more easily attracted to the bait.There is a bycatch of loggerhead, leatherback and olive ridley turtles in longline and purse seine fisheries. According to the IUCN Red List, leatherbacks are critically endangered in the southwest Atlantic. Observer data for all gears for the whole Atlantic for October 2021 - October 2022 indicates: 190 dead discards of turtles, 3,752 live discards and 69 discards of unknown status. Given the poor observer coverage, this is likely to be an underestimate of the total catch. Data on the impact of individual fisheries is not publicly available. Post-release mortality is 1-4%. Longliners are required to safely unhook and release alive turtles, and purse seiners must avoid encircling them. In 2023, ICCAT brought in additional measures that had been scientifically recommended and proven to be effective, which is to use either circle hooks or finfish bait, or other recommended measures. However, countries achieving 10% observer coverage can request an exemption from this.Albatrosses and large petrels are amongst the most threatened groups of birds in the world, due in a large part to the impacts of bycatch in longline fisheries. In the Atlantic Ocean, bycatch of seabirds is most problematic in waters south of 25°S, which coincides with the greatest densities of albatrosses and large petrels. Observer data for all gears for the whole Atlantic for October 2021 - October 2022 indicates: 1,376 dead discards of seabirds, 55 live discards and 64 discards of unknown status. Data on the impact of individual fisheries is not publicly available. Species recorded included the wandering albatross, the endangered sooty albatross, and the black-browed albatross. Given the poor observer coverage, this is likely to be an underestimate of the total catch. A recent assessment estimated that approximately 30,000-40,000 seabirds were killed by longlining in the Southern Hemisphere (including south Atlantic) between 2012 and 2016. The required mitigation measures do not follow recommended best practice by ACAP (the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels). ICCAT requires one or more measures from a set list of options, including weighted hooks, bird scaring lines and night setting, depending on location and target species. ACAP recommends the simultaneous use of all three, or hook-shielding or underwater bait setting devices.Sharks are both bycaught and targeted in longline fisheries in the Atlantic. Bycatch species include the critically endangered scalloped hammerhead, silky shark, and the bigeye thresher, which is endangered in Europe and the Mediterranean. Observer data for all gears for the whole Atlantic for October 2021 - October 2022 indicates: 804 dead discards of sharks and 1,082 live discards. Data on the impact of individual fisheries is not publicly available. Given the poor observer coverage, this is likely to be an underestimate of the total catch. There are some mitigation measures, such as restrictions on finning, but no gear-specific measures. This is in spite of repeated recommendations from the scientific committee to use circle hooks, which have been shown to increase survival of shortfin mako, blue marlin and swordfish if accidentally caught. Circle hooks to prevent turtle bycatch are only required between 55 degrees N and 35 degrees S, which will not cover the full range of these species. Catching silky sharks, hammerheads, oceanic whitetips, and bigeye threshers is prohibited, and catching other thresher species is discouraged. Shortfin mako, which is heavily overfished, can be caught and retained. However, measures came into force in 2022 and 2023, aimed at ending overfishing of this species.There are no specific management measures to protect marine mammals, including cetaceans. ICCAT has not prioritised collecting data on mammal bycatch to date. More needs to be done to understand and reduce the impact of ICCAT fisheries on marine mammals.
References
ACAP, 2021. ACAP Review of mitigation measures and Best Practice Advice for Reducing the Impact of Pelagic Longline Fisheries on Seabirds. Reviewed at the Twelfth Meeting of the Advisory Committee Virtual meeting, 31 August – 2 September 2021. Available at https://www.acap.aq/resources/bycatch-mitigation/mitigation-advice/3956-acap-2021-pelagic-longlines-mitigation-review-bpa/file [Accessed on 09.12.2021].Anon., 2021. Advances on the collaborative work to assess sea turtle bycatch in pelagic longline and purse seine fleets (Atlantic and Indian oceans and Mediterranean Sea). SCRS/2021/076. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 78(4): 155-166. Available at https://www.iccat.int/Documents/CVSP/CV078_2021/n_4/CV078040156.pdf [Accessed on 16.12.2021].BirdLife South Africa, 2019. Report of the Final Seabird Bycatch Assessment Workshop, 25 February – 1 March 2019. GCP/GLO/365/GFF. FAO-GEF Project Sustainable Management of Tuna Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation in the ABNJ. Available at https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/common_oceans/docs/Tuna/ReportFinalGlobalSeabirdBycatchAssessmentWorkshop.pdf.Clarke, S., Sato, M., Small, C., Sullivan, B., Inoue, Y. & Ochi, D. 2014. Bycatch in longline fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: a global review of status and mitigation measures. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 588. Rome, FAO. 199 pp. Available at https://www.fao.org/3/i4017e/i4017e.pdf.ICCAT, 2020. The development of the seabird component of the ICCAT ecosystem report card. SCRS/2020/045. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(4): 144-156. Available at https://www.iccat.int/Documents/CVSP/CV077_2020/n_4/CV077040144.pdf [Accessed on 16.12.2021].ICCAT, 2022. Report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS). Revision, 6 October 2022. 26-30 September 2022. Madrid, Spain and Online. Available at https://www.iccat.int/com2022/ENG/PLE_104_ENG.pdf [Accessed on 04.01.2023].ICCAT, 2022. Resolutions, Recommendations and other Decisions. Available at https://www.iccat.int/en/RecRes.asp [Accessed on 04.01.2023].ICCAT, 2022. 2022 Secretariat Report on Research and Statistics. PLE-105/2022 presented to the 23rd Special Meeting of the Commission. 13-21 November 2022, Vale do Lobo, Portugal. Available at https://www.iccat.int/com2022/ENG/PLE_105_ENG.pdf [Accessed on 10.01.2023].Okamoto, K., Ochi, D., and Oshima, K., 2017. Review of sea turtle by-catch data in the ICCAT convention area obtained through Japanese scientific observer program. SCRS/2017/155. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 74(7): 3698-3713 (2018). Available at https://www.bmis-bycatch.org/system/files/zotero_attachments/library_1/BYJUU4PR%20-%20CV074073698.pdf [Accessed on 16.12.2021].
Sustainable swaps
Learn more about how we calculate our sustainability ratings.
How our ratings work