Veined squid

Veined squid in the Celtic Seas has declined, so there is concern for stock biomass. Landings have shown a boom and bust pattern, which could indicate overexploitation, so fishing pressure is also of concern. Route 2 scoring has been applied to this rating owing to the lack of reference points for fishing pressure and biomass. Veined squid has high vulnerability (56 out of 100).There are no stock assessments for squid species in UK seas. Two species of long-finned squids - European and veined - are caught together. This makes it difficult to infer species-specific trends. Veined squid is the most frequently caught squid species in UK waters.From 2016-2018, between 7% and 22% of long-finned squid catches in Northeast Atlantic were from the Celtic Seas. Landings reached a low of around 600 tonnes in 2006, increased to around 2,700t in 2011 and dropped to 600t again in 2016. They increased substantially again in 2017 and dropped by more than 50% in 2018. Squid abundance can fluctuate with changes in environmental conditions, but the occurrence of these boom and bust cycles in landings may be at least partly fishery driven. This suggests that exploitation levels are above optimum, and there may be concern for the fishing pressure. From 2016–2018, loliginid squid landings were above the average in Rockall (6b) and below the average in the south west of the UK (7f-k).Some surveys are carried out to assess biomass, but in the Celtic Seas a considerable proportion of the long-finned squids are not identified to species. Trends in this area indicate an increase in biomass of veined squid in 2017 and a drop in 2018. The average biomass in 2016–2018 is lower than in 2013–2015 in most of the region. This indicates concern for the biomass. Overall, UK catches of Loligo species in the Northeast Atlantic have increased 40.4% from 2015 to 2019 (2,362 tonnes to 3,315 tonnes) and the average price increased 16.6% from £3.61/kg to £4.21/kg. Squid fisheries are likely to continue to grow in importance and magnitude as many finfish stocks either are fully or over-exploited. Without adequate stock assessments, there could be concern for future impacts on stocks.

In UK waters, squid fishing is unregulated and no appropriate management is in place for these fisheries.Despite the importance of several species for European fisheries, there is limited management of the fisheries and no routine assessment. Data collection is often either not part of routine fishery data collection or the data are inadequate for assessment. Increasingly, however, cephalopods are seen as alternative target species to replace overexploited finfish stocks, and the growing fishing effort means that management will almost certainly be needed within the next few years.Squid catches are not subject to landings quotas and there is no routine assessment of squid stock(s) to inform management.Management of cephalopod fishing in Europe is largely limited to Minimum Landing Size (MLS) regulations in southern Europe. No minimum legal size applies to squid in this region of the Northeast Atlantic, but in Spain and Portugal a 100 mm MLS for Loligo species is imposed.Trawling is restricted by the present EC regulations on mesh size. However, studies on the selectivity of diamond, hexagonal, and square-mesh codends confirmed that the legal minimum mesh size and codend configurations for demersal trawling are not suitable for regulating fishing on cephalopod species.Loliginid discards are generally negligible and in 2016–2018 represented around 1% of total catches. However, in some areas (7c, 7g and 7h) discards ranged 7-16% in 2016-2018.Loss of eggs either due to trawling over spawning grounds or egg laying on fixed gear may be important and there has been evidence of growth overfishing (high catches of very small squid followed by lower catches later in the season) in the Moray Firth.Both the EU and UK have fishery management measures in place, which can include catch limits, targets for population sizes and fishing mortality, and controls on what fishing gear can be used and where. In the EU, compliance with regulations has been variable, and there are ongoing challenges with implementing some of them. There was a target for fishing to be at Maximum Sustainable Yield by 2020, but this was not achieved.  The Landing Obligation (LO), an EU law that the UK has kept after Brexit, requires all fish and shellfish to be landed, even if they are unwanted (over-quota or below minimum size). It aims to promote more selective fishing methods, reduce bycatch, and improve recording of everything that is caught, not just what is wanted. Compliance with the LO is generally poor and actual levels of discards are difficult to quantify using the current fisheries observer programme. In the UK, it is too early to tell how effective management is, as the Fisheries Act only came into force in January 2021. The Act requires the development of Fisheries Management Plans (FMPs) (replacing EU Multi-Annual Plans) but there are no details yet on how and when these will be developed. FMPs have the potential to be very important tools for managing UK fisheries, although data limitations may delay them for some stocks. MCS is keen to see FMPs for all commercially exploited stocks, especially where stocks are depleted, that include: Targets for fishing pressure and biomass, and additional management when those targets are not being met Timeframes for stock recovery Technologies such as Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) to support data collection and improve transparency and accountability Consideration of wider environmental impacts of the fishery

Most squid is caught by trawlers. There is a potential for damage to the seabed by trawling, and bycatch of unwanted species.In the Northeast Atlantic long-finned squids are mainly landed by the trawl fleet; 92% 2016–2018 (97% in the Celtic Seas). Squids represent a bycatch of larger demersal otter trawl fisheries targeting finfish in which discarded undesirable bycatch can represent over a quarter of the total catch. This may include endangered, threatened or protected species in certain circumstances.Nonetheless, there has been intermittent interest in directed squid fishing in UK waters over the years and directed fishing on squid occurs (e.g., Rockall Bank (West of Scotland) and in the Moray Firth (North Sea). Where trawlers target squid, a “clean” catch can be obtained, but may also occasionally catch larger amounts of unwanted species (25% of total catches by weight).The main population of Veined squid, Loligo forbesii, in UK waters is distributed over the continental shelf and shelf edge, mostly in water 50–250 m deep and within 200 km of the coast. L. forbesii have been recorded at depths of 20–171 m in the North Sea during bottom-trawl surveys.Identification of long-finned squids in the stomach contents of numerous predator species in European seas remains at the level of the family Loliginidae. Nonetheless, L. vulgaris has been identified in the stomach contents of several large pelagic and demersal fish as well as marine mammals.Demersal otter trawling can catch a number of unwanted species, including commercial species, and vulnerable species such as sharks and rays. However, in the North Sea, discard rates of unwanted species are lower than the average (which in general is 30-40% of total catch by weight), at around 16% for commercial species.Demersal otter trawls use doors to hold nets open that penetrate the seabed, resulting in the abrasion of habitat features. The ground ropes, sweeps and bridles of the trawl can have similar abrasive impact. Various closures are in place in the area of this stock, including UK and European Marine Protected Areas. Some MPAs are designated to protect benthic features. If those MPAs were found to be subjected to bottom trawling, MCS would consider it a default red rating unless there is evidence (e.g. environmental impact assessment) indicating the activity does not damage the integrity of the site.

Arkhipkin, A., Rodhouse, P., Pierce, G., Sauer, W., Sakai, M., Allcock, L., Arguelles, J., Bower, J., Castillo, G., Ceriola, L., Chen, C., Chen, X., Diaz-Santana, M., Downey, N., Gonzalez, A., Amores, J., Green, C., Guerra, A., Hendrickson, L., Ibanez, C., Ito, K., Jereb, P., Kato, Y., Katugin, O., Kawano, M., Kidokoro, H., Kulik, V., Laptikhovsky, V., Lipinski, M., Liu, B., Mariategui, L., Marin, W., Medina, A., Miki, K., Miyahara, K., Moltschaniwskyj, N., Moustahfid, H., Nabhitabhata, J., Nanjo, N., Nigmatullin, C., Ohtani, T., Pecl, G., Perez, J., Piatkowski, U., Saikliang, P., Salinas-Zavala, C., Steer, M., Tian, Y., Ueta, Y., Vijai, D., Wakabayashi, T., Yamaguchi, T., Yamashiro, C., Yamashita, N. and Zeidberg, L. (2015). World Squid Fisheries. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 23(2), pp.92-252. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23308249.2015.1026226 [Accessed 08.02.2021]DEFRA (2013). EVID4 Evidence Project Final Report (Rev. 06/11), pp.1-30.Hastie, L., Pierce, G., Pita, C., Viana, M. , Smith, J. and Wangvoralak, S. (2009). Squid Fishing in UK Waters: A Report to SEAFISH Industry Authority. Project Report. University of Aberdeen. Available at https://www.seafish.org/document/?id=72bdf841-6e5b-435f-9dee-b87ffd2c481b [Downloaded 08.02.2021]ICES (2020). Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH; outputs from 2019 meeting). ICES Scientific Reports. 2:46. 121pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.6032. Available at http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Expert%20Group%20Report/EPDSG/2020/Working%20Group%20on%20Cephalopod%20Fisheries%20and%20Life%20History%20(WGCEPH).pdf [Accessed 02.02.2021]Jereb, P., Allcock, L., Lefkaditou, E., Piatkowski, U., Hastie, L. and Pierce, G. (2015). Cephalopod biology and fisheries in Europe: II. Species Accounts. 360 pp. ICES Cooperative Research Report, ICES. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5493. Available at http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR325.pdf [Accessed 02.02.2021]Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2019/1241 [Accessed 11.02.2021]Seafish (2017). RASS Profile: Squid in ICES areas VIIe-h (Celtic Sea and Western English Channel: Loligo vulgaris, Loligo forbesi. Available at https://www.seafish.org/responsible-sourcing/risk-assessment-for-sourcing-seafood-rass/records/squid-in-ices-areas-viie-h-celtic-sea-and-western-english-channel-demersal-otter-trawl/ [Accessed 02.02.2021]Seafish (2017). RASS Profile: Squid, West of Scotland, Demersal Trawl: Loligo vulgaris, Loligo forbesi. Available at https://www.seafish.org/responsible-sourcing/risk-assessment-for-sourcing-seafood-rass/records/squid-west-of-scotland-demersal-trawl/ [Accessed 02.02.2021]Sealife Base (2021). Veined squid (Loligo forbesii). Available at https://www.sealifebase.se/summary/Loligo-forbesii.html [Accessed 02.02.2021]Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (2016). Veined squid NE Atlantic shelf. FishSource profile. In: FishSource [online]. Updated 27 June 2016. Available at https://www.fishsource.org/stock_page/1369  [Accessed 11.02.2021]Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (2016). Inshore squids nei NE Atlantic shelf. FishSource profile. In: FishSource [online]. Updated 4 November 2016. Available at https://www.fishsource.org/stock_page/2013 [Accessed 15.02.2021]